Thursday, January 27, 2011

Why are some Waldorf school parents so emotional?

Parents love and want the best for their children. They live vicariously through their children’s experiences, good and bad, and defend and protect their children vigilantly. All of this, healthfully pursued, is noble, good, and understandable.

The emotions that attend parent experiences in Waldorf schools, however, seem more frequently than at other schools to spill over into extremes.

Sometimes, parents who apply to a Waldorf school have their child rejected, and then seem, instantly, to develop animosity to the school, a school they were almost desperate to be part of moments before; their hopes were high, then their hearts were broken. By contrast, parents of applicants rejected by local prep schools are much more likely to be upset but still to hold the school in high esteem; and, if a place there opens in the future, to send their children. Those rejected by a Waldorf school may form a negative impression that they carry for years. They don’t just feel rejected, they feel ill-used.

Or parents enter a Waldorf school community with tremendous energy, enthusiasm, and idealism, only to have their perceptions change a couple of years later when they realize that the school actually doesn’t, can’t, live up to their image of it. In my experience, this process is more intense than the general “burnout” that parents who volunteer at any school can feel. And schools contribute to this phenomenon—maybe even cause it—by allowing expectations to be so high. Out of insecurity, perhaps, Waldorf schools may represent ideals, far more than they can ever deliver, without offering a healthy dose of reality.

Or parents withdraw their students—sometimes for perfectly valid reasons, and sometimes for reasons that have more to do with adult interactions and not with a child’s experience in school—and badmouth the school for years afterward. Again, by comparison, parents who leave a more conventional school may blame a teacher or an administrator or a social dynamic, but they are less likely, I believe, to blame the school as a whole.

In all of these cases, it seems as if the emotions attached to the experiences are greater than the emotions attached to parallel experiences at another school—Montessori, Country Day, public school.

I have two interlocking theories about why this is so.

First, the idealism and even zealotry of the convert can be dangerous. To the extent that parents act as “converts” to Waldorf education and see Waldorf schools as “more” than just schools, or to the extent that Waldorf schools raise parents’ expectations too high, higher than the schools can ever fulfill, they are in for an awakening down the road. Many families navigate this terrain well, but for a few it provides a shock from which they don’t easily recover.

Second, parents see the world through their children’s eyes and occasionally forget that it’s not appropriate for an adult to see the world only as a third or seventh grader sees it. Research demonstrates, for example, that children lose confidence or faith in school between third and fourth grade. Whether we call this evidence of a “nine year change” or something else, it’s a genuine phenomenon. Teachers see it all the time. Children who loved school and loved their teachers in second grade begin to question these things in third and fourth grade. A parent invested in perfection just can’t stand to hear the words—perhaps uttered more as a test than as a fact, “I hate my teacher.” The teacher is the same one of whom the student said the year before, “I love my teacher.” Usually it’s the student who is changing, of course, not the teacher. (This is not an argument for parent blindness—not all teachers are good teachers for every student, and no parent should be so zealous as to keep a child in a class or school against better judgment.)

And parents don’t just lend undue credence to the reports of their children, they often affect the behavior of their children, as well. I have seen seventh grade parents, upset with children’s behavior that caused hurt feelings and schisms in the class, behave to each other exactly in order to create hurt feelings and schisms among the parents. A rule of thumb for teachers and administrators might be, parents may look like adults, but, when pushed, will behave like the children in whom they have such a great stake.

I don’t say this to insult parents (I have two children myself, and my wife frequently used to ask, “How can you be so good with other people’s children, and so obtuse with your own?”) but to warn of unconscious behavior that can only make some difficult situations worse.

What do you think?

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Good question although I am going to consider it in a slightly different way: Why does parent behavior that can be found everywhere take on such an emotional character in Waldorf schools?

I think the crux of the issue is that there are widely divergent views of what Waldorf is and should be. For the people who find a place for themselves here, they begin to have a deeply personal relationship with their school. Why? I think it is because so much commitment is necessary to carry forward. There is a financial commitment, a social commitment, a philosophical commitment and, scariest of all, a commitment on behalf of your child. Of course, the rewards are many but the fact is that these commitments are active. There is:

-the tuition check
-the volunteering and the desire not to let the community down
- the requirement to live out your values daily and
-the reality of doing so in light of the many cultural impulses in the opposite direction.

It all means that parents are well aware of their commitment on an almost daily basis. On the other hand, the education of a child (especially when done in this way) unfolds so very sloooowly. Parents are essentially on a journey without a roadmap to show them how far they have come and how close they are to their destination. And, as you point out, kids change along the way!

Its a really hard balancing act for parents and I think one of the results can be either inflated perceptions of how wonderful things are or these dramatic breaks that some families go through when they leave. IMO a hidden, unexamined, deeply-felt personal relationship is at the heart of both scenarios. I wonder how well any of us reaffirm to ourselves that it is ok to have doubts, resentments and criticisms in a place where everyone is trying so very hard to be good. After all, raising children is hard! Getting along with a bunch of people for years at a time is hard! It doesn't matter if you are all vegetarians and like to knit!!! The key is, as an adult, figuring out how to relate honestly to yourself and to those around you. Honest & nice is easy. Honest & not-so-nice is very tricky indeed.

Personally, I am convinced that niceness is the bourgeois affliction of American Waldorf schools and conflict should be recognized for the balancing agent it can be.

inclusivemothering said...

I just wanted to say I really enjoyed your post.

I do not have the head space for a more thorough comment, but this is something I have wondered about as I have found such bitterness expressed from parents who have left Waldorf for one reason or another.

I am a Waldorf graduate, with a father as a teacher/administrator - and I just wanted to understand why some parents felt the need for support groups to get through the trauma of being part of a Waldorf school.

I do not think Waldorf is for every family, but I found it hard to relate to the rhetoric of "we are Waldorf survivors".

I look forward to nosing around your blog some more - and have forwarded it to my family/friends who are working in Waldorf schools.

Anonymous said...

Well, as someone who has tried a Waldorf school for their child and just been told by the teacher after 6 weeks that he doesn't "fit in" and they will extend a trial period till the end of term - at which point he would be kicked out - I'm pretty emotional!
I took him out of mainstream school where he was unhappy, persuaded by Waldorf that their methods were better. After the initial trial period he seemed to love the school and they said they loved him. However, since I've discovered that he has been bullied by other pupils, which the school denies, they think he is no good. Apparently a silly dance "walk like an Egyptian" he learnt at his old school "frightened" the other children who are so much smaller than him (he is the second oldest in a class of 7-8 year olds). I am now told he doesn't work hard enough. They wan't him to see the Steiner doctor who may prescribe some alternative medicine to make him into, I don't know what, since in the same breath I'm told that despite "concerns" they think he's "sweet". He just doesn't somehow fit in. Unlike a boy from their community who is apparently alarmed by my son and is allegedly much younger (3/4 months) - this poor child recently injured a teacher with a trap he set - no repercussions here though as he's one of them.

I am furious and really worried about his and my future. If they decide they don't want him I may have to give up work and teach him at home as I couldn't face sending him to another school only to be rejected again. This would halve our income and ruin my career.

Emotional - you bet I am, instead of helping my child, Waldorf may have wrecked our life.

Patrice said...

Hello, Steve. Thanks for bringing up this subject. I think the most important concerns here are community and communication.

When a family joins a Waldorf school, all members of the family become part of a tight community. The schools are small, the ideals high, the sense of meaning and purpose deep. The universal, nondenominational spiritual aspects underlying the education fill a need for many that often isn't filled in other ways in modern life. The chances to come together during meaningful festivals and events, and the high expectations that parents will really participate in and support the school's life, bring everyone together, sometimes in intense ways, and call upon their sense of idealism, which can be wonderful and powerful.

But this situation can simultaneously be compelling and off-putting, depending on how you feel about whether your family meshes with the community or how the education or teacher fits your child, especially if you're just getting your feet wet and are learning your way around.

At any rate, once a family has had a chance to get involved in various ways and develop bonds within the school community, they tend to feel, more so than at other schools because of the depth, ideals and intimacy of the community, like they are part of a family rather than just a school. To feel rejected from that family is painful, particularly if you've made major changes in your life to go in the direction of a Waldorf education (moving for the sake of going to a particular school, etc.), whether or not there may be a more objective reason that a family and a school might not be a good match.

That's where the communication is so essential. Clearly, a Waldorf education as offered by Waldorf schools isn't for everyone, and the schools may not be able to best serve all families' needs and expectations. But if this is the case, then the communications around a family leaving need to be especially sensitive and loving. Understandably, sometimes parents in their grief can be a challenge. But it's important to be open, loving and positive during this transition. Perhaps sometimes there is a feeling of the school or teacher being rejected or unappreciated while the family and child simultaneously feel rejected or unappreciated. It's a very sensitive time, and I think the communications need to be especially loving and thoughtful during these transitions on the part of the school--another ideal not always met in the real world in every situation.

I personally know several families who have left a Waldorf school who clearly went through all the classic stages of grief. We all need to be sensitive to this phenomenon. I'm grateful that Waldorf education has been a wonderful match for my family and children for more than 10 years now, and can also imagine that anything that would cause me to turn in another direction, seemingly matter-of-fact or not, would feel deeply painful.

Labels

Followers