“Want to see me make a pencil disappear?”
This is a quotation from a gruesome scene in “The Dark Knight,” a violent Batman movie, involving the Joker, a pencil, and a victim’s eye socket. When you hear a third grader quote this line and then announce that he’s seen the movie twice over the weekend, you may wonder, again, what’s wrong with some parents.
I am observing a third grade teacher, a good caring teacher with a class of sixteen sweet students. But yesterday, a rainy Monday, nearly half the class entered jittery, speaking in hollow voices, and acting out movie scenes and video game scenarios with which they had spent the weekend.
Most of them were boys. One seemed to be a puppet, suspended by invisible strings in a cloud of pop culture, unable to use his voice or body without reference to the mostly violent images in his mind. Another was passive; his handshake reminded me of the dead fish handshake of a profound alcoholic I used to know. Another couldn’t approach a classmate without kicking at his groin, smacking his bottom, or slapping his face.
The students who had not spent the weekend this way watch, closely, learning second-hand—I think of the effects of second-hand smoke—about a culture for which none of them is ready. I’m not sure I’m ready for it—engaging with it requires developing calluses on my soul that I increasingly begrudge.
It may be tempting to think of these boys as brats or brutes, but they’re not to blame. They can’t help themselves. And they seem in other ways to be among the more sensitive students in the class—tougher home lives, more delicate constitutions. They--and their parents, who could know better--are the victims of a natural selection (or unnatural selection) for insensitivity.
I wish these students’ parents could sit in the back of the room, as I am doing, and watch. I doubt they see this at home. There’s no audience, no expectation of school-appropriate behavior. They can always order a child outside, or to his room. They can always turn the TV on again.
Life may be faster, more complex, and more challenging than in the past, leaving parents and teachers feeling at a loss. But perhaps life isn’t actually faster or more complex. Perhaps its simpler and not challenging enough. Maybe there are hours and hours of nothing real to do, a lack of meaningful work, a lack of real demands.
Another illusion of the apparent pace and complexity of life is the illusion that ethical questions are harder and more complex—perhaps too complex for normal people and better left to academic or government experts. But, just as education is, at heart, as simple as the relationship between a teacher and a student, ethical questions are, at heart, as simple as the choices that a person makes and doesn’t make.
This is not to deny the thorniness of stem cell research and abortion and gun control. But their thorniness is due to our uncertain knowledge and understanding, not to our inadequate ethics. Guns in the abstract may seem to pose moral and political dilemmas, but a gun in my hand involves absolutely clear moral choice.
By Tuesday, the effects of the weekend are less noticeable. The teacher tells me that by Friday she feels like she can really teach again. And then the kids go home for the weekend.
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Puppets Speaking in Hollow Voices: Children in a Cloud of Pop Culture
Labels:
pop culture,
television,
video games
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Labels
- administration (1)
- adolescence (5)
- advertising (1)
- alternatives (2)
- american (3)
- Aristotle (1)
- art (1)
- asses (1)
- Barfield (7)
- benjamin bloom (1)
- bloom's taxonomy (1)
- Bortoft (2)
- bureaucracy (1)
- charter schools (1)
- cheating (1)
- class size (1)
- cognition (2)
- cold war (1)
- Coleridge (1)
- college (1)
- computers (4)
- consciousness (3)
- consumerism (1)
- creativity (2)
- destiny (1)
- development (4)
- doodling (1)
- douglas gerwin (1)
- douglas sloan (2)
- drug abuse (1)
- early childhood (4)
- egypt (1)
- emerson (3)
- european (1)
- fish (1)
- freedom (2)
- funding (1)
- garden city (2)
- gardner (4)
- gatto (1)
- geometry (1)
- gladwell (1)
- goetz (1)
- governance (5)
- Gruber (2)
- harwood (3)
- henry james (1)
- high school (6)
- history (15)
- holistic education (1)
- homelessness (2)
- homeschooling (2)
- humanities (2)
- husserl (1)
- Internet (1)
- juergen habermas (1)
- karma (1)
- knowledge (2)
- l. ron hubbard (1)
- lawrence wright (1)
- Lewis (2)
- m. c. richards (3)
- math teaching (3)
- memory (2)
- Mencken (1)
- merleau-ponty (1)
- michael lipson (1)
- middle school (2)
- millennial child (1)
- milwaukee (1)
- Monke (1)
- morality (1)
- myrin (2)
- nancy parsons-whittaker (1)
- new age (1)
- new york steiner school (2)
- no child left behind (2)
- oakeshott (1)
- oberman (3)
- parents (2)
- paul haggis (1)
- peter curran (1)
- piaget (1)
- Plato (1)
- play (1)
- Polanyi (2)
- polarity (1)
- pop culture (1)
- powerpoint (1)
- psychology (3)
- public education (5)
- racism (1)
- reading (1)
- reform (3)
- relativism (1)
- rembrandt (1)
- research (2)
- ripley (1)
- rudolf steiner (15)
- salience (1)
- sartre (1)
- schwartz (4)
- scientology (1)
- small schools (4)
- spirit (3)
- sri rajneesh (1)
- stephen talbott (1)
- synesthesia (1)
- teacher education (5)
- teaching (14)
- television (1)
- testing (1)
- textbooks (1)
- values (1)
- variations (2)
- video games (1)
- vocation (1)
- waldorf education (42)
- will (1)
- Winnicott (1)


5 comments:
This post, like watching some of the kids living on a media diet, leaves me feeling very sad. I often hear teachers speak of parents in blaming ways. But somehow I think we need to rise up as educators of parents as well, providing understanding and support in the hopes that the parents will seek guidance on how to fill their children's lives with healthier activities. One child at a time....
Kirsten Archibald
As you know, I believe teachers are far from perfect and could often do much more to promote healthy partnerships with parents. But, when a school does all it can--or a lot--to provide a "media policy" and explain it, and then parents abdicate their responsibility (admittedly in the face of tremendous pressure from forces larger and better financed than they are), it is really, really sad.
I remember being one of those kids who didn't understand and didn't have a movie quote to share. At the time I was furious with my parents, now I thank them with everything I have.
This is a very tricky time to raise a child-In a culture with gangsta shooting video games, the internet, everyone having a cell phone/text pad, AND a society where both parents seem to work all the time....BUT, I remember being doubled over in a Eurythmy class after a professionally delivered groin hit from a friend (from a non-TV watching Waldorf family). This was in the 13 channel pre-MTV days (1979ish)... Maybe boys will be boys. Tripping the person walking in front of you was another (silly) but big hobby of pretty much everyone. In the 1950's maybe it was wearing a Davey Crockett hat and shooting birds with a BB gun. Does Pop culture change human behavior, is it a reflection of it, or is it a vicious cycle??? It can't all be media?
Steve, I'm glad to have found your blog (through Kerensa Doss on Facebook, to speak of pop culture!).
I struggle with this issue as my son is surrounded by kids who love Pokemon, watch Star Wars movies, etc. and he has no idea what to do with all of that. Part of me does not want him to grow up in a cultural vacuum (we are giving him our family culture; here I'm speaking of the culture of the world around us) to his detriment, though I believe he will, like Robin Marie mentioned, someday thank me.
I think "boys will be boys" is certainly true in some respects. My son has never been allowed to play with toy guns of any kind, and yet can and will make a passable gun out of any material at hand. But that is completely different than being in the thrall of movies and TV so that all interactions are colored by them, violent and disrespectful and otherwise.
In my experience many parents are completely baffled by the concept of not watching TV and movies, and so they cannot conceive of limiting media for their children. It's like the idea can't even penetrate their consciousness. I have sympathy for that, even as I wish it could be different.
Post a Comment